Joint Base San Antonio Archaeology and Cultural Resources Archive

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

A meeting was held at the Texas Historical Commission to discuss Randolph Air Force Base's projects. This letter details the negotiations that took place during the meeting. This letter is part of correspondence concerning the rehabilitation and replacement of windows and doors at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Also included are notes and discussion on organization and the process of gaining permission for the undertakings.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This letter provides background, description of the current situation, and recommendations for a project to install fencecrete at select sites at Randolph Air Force Base. This correspondence also indicates that there was a determination of no adverse effect for the proposed undertaking.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This letter gives an update on the information and plans for sitting the subject carports. The correspondence also lists requirements completed.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

This memo concerns the involvement of Sharon Fleming, the project reviewer, in the installation of each fence in the historic housing neighborhoods in Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The building specifically addressed in Building 418.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Internal coordination concerning the memorandum on a proposed project for Hangar 62 at Randolph Air Force Base.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Internal coordination on the memorandum providing the State Historic Preservation Office with project information and it requests comments on the proposed design of a canopy at the southwest corner of Hangar 63 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. Additionally, a double door will be cut into the hangar wall between the pillars.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The attached letter to the SHPO indicates our intent to replace all original roofing tiles on historic buildings because they are brittle and broken. In the original Section 106 letter to the SHPO in 1992 we indicated that we would use the original tiles if at all possible. In 1993, US Tile’s Bernardo Blend was selected as a replacement of the original and for future new construction roofing tiles. The sentence in the first Section 106 letter to the SHPO we sent to your office and was changed so...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The attached letter to the SHPO spells out the intent to replace all original roofing tiles on historic buildings because they are brittle and broken. US Tile’s Bernardo Blend was selected as a replacement of the original and for future new construction roofing tiles. The determination was No Adverse Effect; therefore, additional coordination with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) is required.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd. Emmitt G. Smith. Thomas J. McDonald.

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) Report to the President and Congress 1993, including correspondence on eligibility statuses of Randolph Air Force Base's Building 156 and Hangar 7 Pumphouse.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Rachel Fernandez

Memo from Lawrence O. Baily Jr., Director, Environmental Management, indicating that the PA for the management and care of historical resources on Kelly AFB was signed and became effective on 2 May 2000.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Ritchey Woods.

Record of correspondence made in an effort to ascertain how and where the components for the original steel framed windows removed from Building 902 had been disposed of at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. This letter is part of a group of correspondence concerning a federal undertaking at Building 902, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. The project includes modification, refurbishment and replacement of windows and doors.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

In reference to the management action plan to develop a memorandum of introduction to Native American tribes, this root cause analysis states that personnel were working under the impression that coordination was only required if the proposed project had a possible adverse effect on traditional religious or was of cultural importance. They overlooked the requirement to, “…meet periodically with each Indian Tribe”.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum gives a root cause analysis that the original Cultural Resources Management Plan was published in November 1996 and subsequently updated and replaced by the Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) in July 2003. As required by AFI32-7065, 1 Jun 2004, paragraph 1.4.7.4, the ICRMP will be reviewed every five years; this action was completed 30 Oct 2008. Personnel were aware of the outdated mission statement; however, elected to wait final transformation and a Wing...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

A management action plan to develop a memorandum of introduction to Native American tribes, from south central Texas, emphasizing the desire to maintain an information conduit. The memorandum will explain that Randolph completed an archeological survey with negative findings of Native American traditional religious or of cultural importance. The memorandum will recognize the unique government-to-government relationship that exists between the federal government and tribes; it will be...

DOCUMENT Full-Text John Manguso.

An outline of the proposed monograph on the history of Camp Bullis. This memorandum requests comments and suggestions for additional topics or matters to be considered for inclusion in the study. The monograph traces the development and use of facilities at Camp Bullis and Leon Springs Military Reservation from their origins to the present.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Michael K. Trimble.

The U.S. Army Engineer District, St. Louis, has been designated the Corps' Mandatory Center of Expertise for the Curation and Management of Archaeological Collections. We have been tasked by the U.S. Army Environmental Center to locate and assess archaeological collections derived from Army-owned lands, to identify the federally recognized Native American tribes most likely culturally affiliated with the collections, to draft Section 6 Summary letters for each installation, and to conduct...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Memorandum from Cultural Resources Manager sent to Hunt Building Company regarding the involvement of Building 300 in a proposed Randolph Family Housing Scope of Work. It was determined Building 300 is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and is located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. After reviewing the proposed Scope of Work and our discussion of the project, it was determined that the action will have no adverse effect on the historic property or on the...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Bruce R. Nadler.

This memorandum concerns the proposed construction of a canopy and the cutting of a double doorway on the secondary elevation of Hangar 63. Hanger 63 is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is located in the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. The Base Civil Engineer determined an undertaking does exist with potential to affect historic properties.

DOCUMENT Full-Text David H. Brigham.

The 0.531 acre parcel extending beyond the fence line of Fort Sam Houston on Old Austin Road has been evaluated. This document is part of a group of correspondence concerning a 0.531-acre parcel at Old Austin Road on the north-central portion of Fort Sam Houston, Texas. The documentation provided in these letters help evaluate the character of the property, before it is transferred to the City of San Antonio, in exchange for a perpetual non-exclusive use agreement to facilitate the realignment...

DOCUMENT Full-Text G. Kenneth Grim.

A memorandum for disbursement sent from Tetra Tech Inc. to Fort Worth District, Norfolk District, Mobile District, Fort Sam Houston, and the RCI Office. This memorandum transmits the final Environmental Baseline Survey for Residential Communities Initiative Properties at Fort Sam Houston, Texas.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Harry F. Finke.

The following guidance are now policy to clarify current painting color schemes on the exterior of Randolph facilities. The current policy for painting facilities revolves around architecture compatibility. Randolph AFB basically employs a tri-color exterior scheme consisting of FED-STD 595 (Rev A) colors only. Approved schemes reflect changes in policy effective with this letter. Deviations from this policy require Wing Commander approval.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Harvey Browder.

This memorandum addresses an amendment that was issued to add historical compliance requirements for the Hangar 6 entrance door at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Leon D. Spradling.

This memorandum provides documentation for the proposed construction of an internal elevator and upgrade of the external access ramp at Building 100. Repair and Renovation of the antiquated electrical, electronic, security, water and sewer systems will be modernized. All steel casement windows will be repaired. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Neil K. Kanno.

This memorandum concerns the installation of quarry tile on the steps of Building 100 at Randolph Air Force Base. After careful and in-depth consideration of this undertaking, Randolph determined there would be an effect. However, the effect would not result in the removal of the building from the Register or significantly distract from its character-defining features. As a result, the determination is No Adverse Effect. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum discusses the proposed construction of a handicapped ramp on the secondary elevation of Building 671, located in the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Randolph has determined "no adverse effect" for the undertaking. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum discusses the functional use of Hangar 70. Hangar 70 is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and it is located in the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Constructed in 1931 to store and repair aircraft, it was converted to a gymnasium circa 1942. In 2007, a new gymnasium (Fitness Center) was completed. This action will allow Hangar 70 is to be renovated and returned to function as an aircraft hangar.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum provides documentation for the proposed interior rehabilitation and restoration of Building 100, a structure listed on the National Register of Historic Places and located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Randolph has determined that the undertaking is "No Adverse Effect" and has provided in this letter summery documentation for review. Copied to this correspondence is the San Antonio Conservation Society.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Richard Trevino.

This memorandum discusses an undertaking at Hangar 64, a facility listed on the National Register of Historic Places and located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. Included is an undertaking description and assessment. Randolph Air Force Base determined an undertaking does exist with a potential to affect historic properties.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

A review was conducted on Hangar 70 by applying procedures contained in the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470f, and its implementing regulations, 36 CFR part 800 (Section 106), and the guidelines of Division Instruction 32-1 as they pertain to the effects of rehabilitation treatment measures criteria. It was determined that this property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and it is located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. After reviewing...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The Department of the Air Force conducted an evaluation on Building 216, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is located within the Randolph Field Historic District. It was also determined that the proposed scope of work would have an adverse effect on the historic property or its district - this letter explains this decision.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on the Temporary Lodging Facilities and determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After reviewing the scope of work and discussions of the proposed project to replace front and rear external doors, it as determined that the action will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property or its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 901 and determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After review of the scope of work and past, related discussions it was determined that the action will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property or its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 901 and determined the property was listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After reviewing the proposed design for the building, it was determined the action will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property or its district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 671 and it was determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After reviewing Work Request 8400, it was determined that the action will have no adverse effect on the historic property and its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

An evaluation was conducted on Buildings 907 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that this property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and it is located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. The proposal to construct a wall and insulate the doors between Rooms 211 and 212 would be determined to be an Adverse Effect and would violate the terms of the MOA. Randolph Air Force Base recommends the proposal be disapproved.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 671 and determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After reviewing the scope of work and discussions of the proposed project, it was determined that the action will have no adverse effect on the historic property and its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an Evaluation on Building 900, and after reviewing the scope of work and previous discussions of the project, it was determined that the proposed action will have no adverse effect on the historic property or its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on the proposal to construct a Fire Equipment Building in front of Building 902. After reviewing the scope of work and past discussions of the project, it was determined that the proposed action will have no adverse effect on the historic building or its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

An evaluation was conducted on Building 975, the Airmen Ministry Center, at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that this property is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places; however, it is in the Area of Potential Effect.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 102 concerning external wall repair. After reviewing the scope of work it was determined that the action will have "no adverse effect" on the historic property or its district. Copied to this correspondence is Father Richard Novotny.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

An evaluation was conducted on Hangars 40 and 41 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined this property is eligible for listing on the National Resgister of Historic Places. After reviewing the proposed project, it was determined the action will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 667. It was determined that the property is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places and after reviewing the scope of work and associated discussions of the proposed project, it was determined that the action will have no adverse affect.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 100's Dome Doors. After reviewing the scope of work it was determined that external renovation of the doors will have "no adverse effect" on the historic property and its landmark district. This letter details the conditions Randolph has put in place in order for this determination to be met.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation of Building 100. After reviewing the scope of work it was determined that external renovation of the Theater at Building 100 will have "no adverse effect" on the historic property or its district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 100. After reviewing the scope of work and our discussion of the proposed project, it was determined the proposed action to suspend the acoustical ceilings will have an "adverse effect" on the historic property and the landmark district. The proposal is disapproved.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force bAse conducted and evaluation on Building 861 and determined that the property is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After review of the scope of work and past discussions, it was determined that the action will have no adverse effect on the landmark district in which the property is located.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

An evaluation was conducted on Hangar 40 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. After reviewing the proposed project to renovate the hangar's infrastructure, it was determined the action will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 200. After reviewing the scope of work for the courtyard renovation, it was determined that the action will have "no adverse effect" on the historic property or on the landmark district. This letter also includes conditions needed to be met in order for the undertaking to move forward.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The Department of the Air Force conducted an evaluation on Building 235 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and that the proposed internal renovation would have no adverse effect.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The Department of the Air Force at Joint Base San Antonio conducted an evaluation on building 900 and determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After reviewing the scope of work, and discussions of the project, it was also determined that an undertaking exists and it will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property or its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

An evaluation was conducted on Hangar 6 at Randolph Air Force Base. It was determined that this property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and it is located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. After reviewing the scope of work and discussions of the proposed project, it was determined that the action will have No Adverse Effect on the historic property or on the landmark district. This letter lists the conditions that need to be met in order for the project...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

An evaluation was conducted on Building 905 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that the proposed project for Room 111 in Building 905 will have no adverse effect on the historic property or on the landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

An evaluation was conducted on Building 905 at Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. It was determined that the project, concerning french doors on the second floor of Building 905, will have no adverse effect on the historic property or its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

The Department of the Air Force conducted an evaluation on Building 671 and determined that the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. After reviewing the scope of work and discussions of the proposed project it was determined an undertaking does exist but not in a manner that would diminish the integrity of the historic building and its landmark district.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

Randolph Air Force Base conducted an evaluation on Building 112. After reviewing the current scope of work for external door renovation, the Texas SHPO determined the action will have "no adverse effect" on the landmark district as long as the conditions listed in this letter are met.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Chelsea Walter

Headquarters, U.S. Army Air Defense Artillery Center and Fort Bliss of the Department of the Army has determined that the operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and other treatment of buildings, structures, objects and grounds (facilities) fifty or more years old and certain facilities of extraordinary regional, state, or national significance less than fifty years old may have an affect on properties included in, eligible for inclusion in, have not yet evaluated and may be eligible for...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Chelsea Walter

Fort Sam Houston has determined that the demolition of Buildings 376, 377, and 4115 at Fort Sam Houston and Building 5102 at Camp Bullis will have an adverse effect of the Fort Sam Houston Conservation District, which is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and has consulted with the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer regarding implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Fort Sam Houston.

An unsigned agreement regarding the Department of the Army, Fort Sam Houston (FSH) and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation regarding the demolition of building 1030. Fort Sam Houston (FSH) has determined that the Demolition of Building 1030 at Fort Sam Houston (undertaking) will have an adverse effect on the FSH Conservation District, which is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and has consulted with the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) pursuant to 36...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Chelsea Walter

A partially signed agreement indicating that Fort Sam Houston has determined that the demolition of Building 1030 at Fort Sam Houston will have an adverse effect on the Fort Sam Houston Conservation District, which is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and has consulted with the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer pursuant to regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.

DOCUMENT Full-Text F. Lawrence Oaks.

This Memorandum of Agreement states that Fort Sam Houston has determined that the demolition of Building 5002 at Camp Bullis will have an adverse effect on the historic property. It documents the coordination and discussion between Fort Sam Houston and the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer, as well as the City of San Antonio regarding the effects of the undertaking. This MOA is part of a group of correspondence and a memorandum for the Section 106 project review of Fort Sam Houston's...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Fort Sam Houston.

An unsigned agreement regarding the Department of the Army, Fort Sam Houston and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, to demolish buildings 5101 and 5002. Fort Sam Houston has determined that the Demolition of Buildings 5101 and 5002 at Camp Bullis will have an adverse effect on these properties, which are eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and has consulted with the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer pursuant to 36 CFR Part 800, regulations implementing Section...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Donald L. Peterson.

Randolph Air Force Base has determined that a project to rehabilitate Buildings 901, 903, and 907 will have an effect upon these properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, and has consulted with the State of Texas, State Historic Preservation Officer and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. The mentioned parties agree that the project shall be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations in order to take into account the effect of the...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Fort Sam Houston.

A signed agreement between the Department of the Army, Fort Sam Houston, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. The Department of the Army, Fort Sam Houston and its sub-installation at Camp Bullis, has determined that an undertaking to demolish buildings 186, 2009, 4200, 4201, 4202, 4299, 1198, 2004, 2653, 4227, 5016, 5033, 5134, 5136, 5137, 5138, 5140, 5149, 5150, 5151,6080, 6081, 6082, 6090, 6091, and 6089 will have an adverse effect on properties that are eligible for inclusion...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Department of the Army.

Signed agreement stating that the Department of the Army has determined that the construction of a Branch Exchange Shopette on Wilson Road in the Conservation District of Fort Sam Houston will have an effect upon a portion of the Southern Pacific Railroad spur, a structure eligible for inclusion in .the National Register of Historic Places, and has consulted with the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. Now, therefore, the Department of...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Fort Sam Houston.

The Directorate of Public Works at Fort Sam Houston, Texas has determined that demolition of the historic properties listed in this document will have an effect upon the Fort Sam Houston National Historic Landmark District, National Register Conservation District and its Camp Bullis sub-installation. Consultation with interested groups included the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer, the San Antonio Conservation Society, and the Society for the Preservation of Historic Fort Sam Houston....

DOCUMENT Full-Text Fort Sam Houston.

A signed agreement between the Department of the Army, Fort Sam Houston and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. The Department of the Army, Fort Sam Houston, has determined that an undertaking to demolish buildings 2399, 252, and 239 will have an adverse effect on properties that are eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, and has consulted with the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer, in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Fort Sam Houston.

A signed agreement regarding the Department of the Army, Fort Sam Houston and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. The Department of the Army, Fort Sam Houston, has determined that an undertaking to demolish buildings 4226, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 will have an adverse effect on properties that are eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, and has consulted with the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer, in accordance with Section 106 of the National...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Department of the Army.

A signed agreement stating that the Department of the Army has determined that the construction of a Community Center, including a PX Expansion, construction of a Chicken Loft fast food restaurant, and relocation of administrative offices at Fort Sam Houston will have an effect upon the National Register Conservation District, Building 371, and Building 372 eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, and has consulted with the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Department of the Army.

A signed agreement stating that the Department of the Army has determined that the construction of a temporary facility for the U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research sited on Patch Road adjacent to the National Historic Conservation District at Fort Sam Houston will have an effect upon a portion of the Patch - Chaffee housing area eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, and has consulted with the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Fort Sam Houston.

An unsigned agreement regarding the Department of the Army, Fort Sam Houston and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. The Department of the Army, Fort Sam Houston, has determined that an undertaking to demolish building 1030 will have an adverse effect on properties that are eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, and has consulted with the Texas State Historic Preservation Officer, in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, 16...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Toman.

This memorandum is a detailed summary of those areas within the boundaries of Fort Sam Houston which have been used as firing ranges or chemical warfare training. This survey is based upon records, historical reports, maps, and photographs on hand at the Fort Sam Houston Museum. It is possible that some sites were not discovered and that some of the information as to the location and use is incomplete.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Michael Hilger.

Building 293 was built in 1910 and is located within the National Historic Landmark District at Fort Sam Houston. The Programmatic Agreement lists this building as a Category 3 resource of minor historic importance. (AR 420-40) Building 293 may not individually meet the National Register criteria for eligibility but it contributes to the significance of the Landmark District and adjacent Category I and II resources. The above referenced building is well known to the Texas State Historic...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Scott B. Shepherd III.

A review was conducted on Hangar 76 by applying Federal criteria, the Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan guidance and the procedures of Division Instruction 32-1. It was determined that this property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and it is located within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. After reviewing the scope of work of the proposal, it was determined that the action will have “No Adverse Effect” on the historic property or on the landmark...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Leon D. Spradling.

This memorandum provides documentation for a proposed T-43 aircraft static display within the Randolph Field Historic Landmark District. This aircraft operated at Randolph from 1992 to 2010 and were specifically used to train navigators. These aircraft are being phased out from the Air Force inventory. The static display will insure a place in history for this venerable training aircraft and its use at Randolph Field. An appropriate plaque will be placed at the site. Copied to this...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Chelsea Walter

This is a decision paper to continue consultation on Buildings 6202, 6203 and 6204, Camp Bullis, Texas. This memorandum is part of correspondence and supportive material for the Department of the Army at Fort Sam Houston's proposal to convert Buildings 6202, 6203, and 6204 at Camp Bullis for use in the Army's urban assault training program.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Randle K. Bunner.

Memorandum regarding archaeological investigations at the Lackland AFB housing area and testing at sites 41BX1088 and 41BX1076.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Thomas R. Zachary.

Memorandum regarding consultation with the SHPO and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation concerning the historical preservation status of Lackland Air Force Base.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Oscar V. Bryan.

Memorandum regarding an update on the historical preservation program for Lackland Air Force Base.

DOCUMENT Full-Text William V. Blount.

Letter to the Commander of Lackland Air Force Base regarding communication with the Texas SHPO office affirming no sites or buildings on Lackland Air Force Base qualify for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: adam brin

This document is a Q.M.C. Form for the mess hall and kitchen (building number 21) at Camp Bullis, Texas. It details the material construction, capacity and other specs associated with the building. The form was approved by the Secretary of War as required by A.R. 30-1435. Additions, repairs and installations to the building(s) along with their associated cost are also recorded. This Q.M.C. Form was revised in 1939, with the original completion date of the building occurring in 1930.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: adam brin

This document is a Q.M.C. Form for the mess hall and kitchen (building number 22) at Camp Bullis, Texas. It details the material construction, capacity and other specs associated with the building. Additions, repairs and installations to the building(s) along with their associated cost are also recorded. This Q.M.C. Form was revised in 1924 but the completion date of the building is recorded as 1930.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: adam brin

This document is a Q.M.C. Form for the mess hall and kitchen (building number 23) at Camp Bullis, Texas. It details the material construction, capacity and other specs associated with the building. Additions, repairs and installations to the building(s) along with their associated cost are also recorded. This Q.M.C. Form is a corrected report showing alterations to the date the building was completed and the cost of alterations made to the building. The original building was completed in 1930,...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: adam brin

This document is a Q.M.C. Form for the mess hall and kitchen (building number 26) at Camp Bullis, Texas. It details the material construction, capacity and other specs associated with the building. The form was approved by the Secretary of War as required by A.R. 30-1435. Additions, repairs and installations to the building(s) along with their associated cost are also recorded. This Q.M.C. Form was revised in 1939, however the completing date for this particular form is recorded as 1930.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: adam brin

This document is a Q.M.C. Form for the mess hall and kitchen (building number 27) at Camp Bullis, Texas. It details the material construction, capacity and other specs associated with the building. The form was approved by the Secretary of War as required by A.R. 30-1435. Additions, repairs and installations to the building(s) along with their associated cost are also recorded. This Q.M.C. Form was revised in 1924 with a completion date of 1930.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: adam brin

This document is a Q.M.C. Form for the kitchen and mess hall (building number 28) at Camp Bullis, Texas. It details the material construction, capacity and other specs associated with the building. The form was approved by the Secretary of War as required by A.R. 30-1435. Additions, repairs and installations to the building(s) along with their associated cost are also recorded. This Q.M.C. Form was revised in 1924 and records the date of completion as 1930.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: adam brin

This document is a Q.M.C. Form for the mess hall and kitchen (building number 31) at Camp Bullis, Texas in 1929. It details the material construction, capacity and other specs associated with the building. Additions, repairs and installations to the building(s) along with their associated cost are also recorded. This Q.M.C. Form was revised by the War Department in 1924 but has a completion date of 1930.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: adam brin

This document is a Q.M.C. Form for the mess hall and kitchen (building number 32) at Camp Bullis, Texas in 1930. It details the material construction, capacity and other specs associated with the building. The form was approved by the Secretary of War as required by A.R. 30-1435. Additions, repairs and installations to the building(s) along with their associated cost are also recorded. This Q.M.C. Form was originally approved and generated in 1930, and was then revised by the War Department in...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: adam brin

This document is a Q.M.C. Form for the mess hall and kitchen (building number 34) at Camp Bullis, Texas in 1930. It details the material construction, capacity and other specs associated with the building. Additions, repairs and installations to the building(s) along with their associated cost are also recorded. This Q.M.C. Form was revised by the War Department in 1939 but has a completion date of 1930.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: adam brin

This document is a Q.M.C. Form for the mess hall and kitchen (building number 35) at Camp Bullis, Texas in 1931. It details the material construction, capacity and other specs associated with the building. Additions, repairs and installations to the building(s) along with their associated cost are also recorded. This Q.M.C. Form was revised by the War Department in 1924 but has a completion date of 1931.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: adam brin

This document is a Q.M.C. Form for the mess hall and kitchen (building number 36) at Camp Bullis, Texas in 1930. It details the material construction, capacity and other specs associated with the building. The form was approved by the Secretary of War as required by A.R. 30-1435. Additions, repairs and installations to the building(s) along with their associated cost are also recorded. This Q.M.C. Form was originally approved and generated in 1930, and was then revised by the War Department in...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Martha Doty Freeman. Karl A. Komatsu.

This report summarizes the methodology and results of on-site organization and cataloging of map and architectural drawings collections performed by Martha Doty Freeman for the Fort Worth District Corps of Engineers at Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas. The organization and cataloging of historic maps occurred between September and October 1989; the organization of architectural drawings occurred between September 1989 and January 1990. Contract DACA 63-89-D-0063 also called for the...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Duane Peter. Martha Doty Freeman.

This document is a draft of Methodology and Results of On-Site Archival Research and Historic Preservation Fort Sam Houston. Personnel of Geo-Marine, Inc. and a consulting archivist, Ms. Martha Doty-Freeman, conducted on-site archival research and historic preservation coordination analysis for the Fort Worth District Corps of Engineers at Fort Sam Houston, Bexar County, Texas between October 1988 and April 1989. The archival research involved the cataloguing of the historical map resources...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Chelsea Walter

This construction project data details a Randolph Air Force Base project to restore a three bedroom, two-story, Field Grade unit which has structural damage. Building 526 will need a stable foundation, a sound fireplace grade beam, and cracks in the beam must be sealed.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Chelsea Walter

Lackland Air Force Base dates from July 4, 1942, when the War Department separated the part of Kelly Field lying west of Leon Creek and made it an independent installation, naming it the San Antonio Aviation Cadet Center. From its acronym (SAACC), many people called the base sack, sack-c, or, less affectionately, sad sack. Even with its own name, townspeople and most military leaders continued to think of it as a part of Kelly Field. The base bore three awkward and innocuous designations in the...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Chelsea Walter

The purposes of this Act are: To declare a national policy which will encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between man and his environment; to promote efforts which will prevent or eliminate damage to the environment and biosphere and stimulate the health and welfare of man; to enrich the understanding of the ecological systems and natural resources important to the Nation; and to establish a Council on Environmental Quality.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Geo-Marine, Inc..

Nomination form for Fort Sam Houston for National Historic Landmark designation. Nomination includes 690 total buildings and structures. Completed by Geo-Marine in 2002.

DOCUMENT Full-Text David H. Brigham.

Status report regarding preservation of historic buildings at Fort Sam Houston. Describes any changes, positive developments, as well as new or ongoing threats to the landmark that have occurred in the past year. Describes actions that would alleviate or minimize threat(s). Changes listed involve the inclusion of building 646, 647, 648, and 602A in the $1.3m renovation project that began in Jan 1997.

DOCUMENT Full-Text David H. Brigham.

This is a Section 8 National Historic Landmark District Status Report for 1998. Fort Sam Houston has 747 properties eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Many of these properties are located within the National Historic Landmark District. This status report update summarizes the positive milestones Fort Sam Houston has made with these properties in the last year, as well as concerns and goals for the future.

DOCUMENT Full-Text Uploaded by: Chelsea Walter

This Act became law on October 15, 1966 (Public Law 89-665, October 15, 1966; 16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). Since enactment, there have been 22 amendments. This description of the Act, as amended, follows the language of the United States Code except that (in common usage) we refer to the “Act” (meaning the Act, as amended) rather than to the “subchapter” or the “title” of the Code. This description also excludes some of the notes found in the Code as well as those sections of the amendments dealing...

DOCUMENT Full-Text Philip Thomason.

Forms for Randolph Air Force Base's National Register of Historic Places Nomination.